بازپروری بزه‌کاران و تجارب بزه دیدگان از عدالت ترمیمی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قائمشهر

چکیده

عدالت ترمیمی، حرکتی است که هدف آن مقابله با پیامدهای جرم از طریق اصلاح و بازسازی روابط بین سه طرف اصلی، یعنی بزه‌کار، بزه دیده و جامعه است. تحلیل رابطهء بین تئوری عدالت ترمیمی و اصول بازپروری مجرم، اشتراکات و تفاوت‌هایی را بین این دو سیستم نشان‌می‌دهد. با وجود اینکه ادعا می­شود عدالت ترمیمی امری بزه‌کار­محور است و بر بهبود اوضاع بزه‌کاران تمرکز دارد ولی برخی از مطالعات، حاکی از تأثیر عدالت ترمیمی بر بهزیستی بزه‌کاران و کاهش ارتکاب جرم در آن‌ها می‌باشد. در این مطالعه تلاش شده است که نشان داده شود مدل‌های بازپروری و عدالت ترمیمی، اگر چه با هم تشابهاتی دارند ولی دو چارچوب هنجاری متمایز با حوزه‌های کاربردی متفاوت هستند و تلاش برای ترکیب آن‌ها اشتباه است. برخی از مطالعات نشان داده­اند که بزه‌کاران معمولاً تجارب رضایت­بخشی از اجرای شیوه­های عدالت ترمیمی دارند و البته تجاربی منفی هم وجود دارند که به آن‌ها نیز اشاره شده است. هدف از این مقاله بازپروری بزه‌کاران و تجارب بزه‌کاران از عدالت ترمیمی می‌باشد. با استفاده از روش کتابخانه‌ای به گردآوری اطلاعات پرداخته شده است. در این مقاله محقق به دنبال پاسخ به این سؤالات می‌باشد آیا بینشی معنادار در مورد روش­های اجرای عدالت ترمیمی و بازپروری وجود دارد، عدالت ترمیمی از چه طرقی و تا چه میزانی موفق به رفع نیازهای بزه دیدگان شده است و اصول و ارزش‌های عدالت ترمیمی چیست.

 

کلیدواژه‌ها


13. Achilles, M.& Zehr, H. (2001). Restorative justice for crime victims: The promise and the challenge. In G. Bazemore & M. Schiff (Eds.). Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities (pp. 87-99). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
14. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company. Ellerby, L., Bedard, J., & Chartrand, S. (2000). Holism, wellness and spirituality. In D. R.
15. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct, 3rd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
16. Bazemore, G., & Bell, D. (2004). What is the appropriate relationship between restorative justice and treatment? In H. Zehr & B. Toews (Eds.), Critical issues in restorative justice (pp. 119−131). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
17. Bazemore, G., & O'Brien, S. (2002). The quest for a restorative model of rehabilitation: Theory-for-practice and practice-for-theory. In L.Walgrave (Ed.), Restorative justice and the law (pp. 31−67). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
18. Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2005). Juvenile justice reform and restorative justice: Building theory and policy from practice. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
19. Bazemore, G., & Walgrave, L. (Eds.) (1999). Restorative juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press. process (part II). Victims and Offenders, 2, 351-373.
20. Bazemore, G., Elis, L., & Green, D. L. (2007). The ―independent variable‖ in restorative justice: Theory-based standards for evaluating the impact and integrity of victim sensitive
21. Bazemore, G., O'Brien, S., & Carey, M. (2006). The synergy and substance of organizational and community change in the response to crime and conflict: The emergence and potential of restorative justice. Public Organization Review: A global journal, 5.
22. Bonta, J., Jesseman, R., Rugge, T., & Cormier, R. (2006). Restorative justice and recividism: Promises made, promises kept? In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective (pp. 108−120). London: Routledge.
23. Coates, R., Umbreit, M. S., & Vos, B. (2003). Restorative justice circles: An exploratory study.
24. Contemporary Justice Review, 6(3), 265-278
25. Cullompton, U.K.: Willan Publishing. Levrant, S., Cullen, F. T., Fulton, B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1999). Reconsidering restorative justice: The corruption of benevolence revisited? Crime & Delinquency, 45, 3−27.
26. Daly, K. (2000). Revisiting the relationship between retributive and restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice: Philosophy to practice (pp. 33−54).
27. Daly, K. (2003). Mind the gap: restorative justice in theory and practice. In A. von Hirsch, J. Roberts, A. E. Bottoms, K. Roach, & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? (pp. 219-235).
28. Daly, K. (2006). The limits of restorative justice. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective (pp. 134−145). London: Routledge.
29. Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns. New York: Guilford.
30. Emmons, R. A. (2003). Personal goals, life meaning, and virtue:Wellsprings of a positive life. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Green, R. (1995). Psycho-educational modules. In B. K. Schwartz & H. R. Cellini (Eds.), The sex offender: Corrections, treatment, and legal practice, Vol. 1. (pp.13.1−13.10). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
32. Harris, N., Walgrave, L., & Braithwaite, J. (2004). Emotional dynamics in restorative conferences. Theoretical Criminology, 8(2), 191-210.
33. Hayes, H. (2007). Reoffending and restorative justice. In G. Johnstone & D.W. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 426−444). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
34. Hayes, H., & Daly, K. (2003). Youth justice conferencing and reoffending. Justice Quarterly, 20(4), 725-764.
35. Johnstone, G. (2002). Restorative justice: Ideas, values, debates. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
36. Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. W. (2007). The meaning of restorative justice. In G.
37. Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press.
38. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T.Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 427−452). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Levrant, S., Cullen, F. T., Fulton, B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1999). Reconsidering restorative justice: The corruption of benevolence revisited? Crime & Delinquency, 45,3−27.
40. Marshall, W. L., Fernandez, Y. M., Serran, G. A., Mulloy, R., Thornton, D., Mann, R. E., & Anderson, D. (2003). Process variables in the treatment of sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 8, 205−234.
41. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
42. Miller, J.M., Gibson, C.L., & Byrd, J. (2008). Getting beyond the liberal feel-good: Toward an accountability-based theoretical research program for restorative justice. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 11, 261-278.
43. Morris, A. & Maxwell, G. (1997). Re-forming juvenile justice: The New Zealand experiment. The Prison Journal, 77(2), 125-134.
44. Morris, A. (2002). Critiquing the critics: A brief response to critics of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 596−615.
45. Pranis, K. (2001). A cry for love. http://www.restorativejustice.org/resources/ docs/cry.
46. Presser, L. & Hamilton, C. A. (2006). The micropolitics of victim-offender mediation, Sociological Inquiry, 76 (3), 316-342.
47. Robinson, G. & Shapland, J. (2008). Reducing recidivism: A task for restorative justice? British Journal of Criminology, 48, 337-358.
48. Robinson, G., & Shapland, J. (2008). Reducing recidivism: A task for restorative justice? British Journal of Criminology, 48, 337−358.
49. Robinson, G., & Sorsby, A. (2006). Situating restorative justice within criminal justice, Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 505-532.
50. Rodriguez, N. (2007). Restorative justice at work: Examining the impact of restorative justice resolutions on juvenile recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 53(3), 355-379.
51. Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J.,
52. Strang, H. (2002). Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
53. Strang, H. (2004). Is restorative justice imposing its agenda on victims? In H. Zehr & B. Toews (Eds.), Critical Issues in Restorative Justice (pp. 95-105). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
54. Umbreit, M. S., & Coates, R. B. (2000). Multicultural implications of restorative justice: Potential pitfalls and dangers. Washington, DC: The Office for Victims of Crime.
55. Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., & Coates, R. B. (2005). Restorative justice dialogue: A review of evidence-based practice. Offender Programs Report, 9(4), 49-64.
56. United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2006). Handbook on restorative justice programmes. Criminal justice handbook series. New York, NY: United Nations.
57. Van Ness, D. W. (2005). An overview of restorative justice around the world. Eleventh United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Retrieved.
58. Van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (2006). Restoring justice: An introduction to restorative justice, 3rd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
59. Ward, T., & Birgden, A. (2007). Human rights and correctional clinical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 628−643.
60. Ward, T., & Gannon, T. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The Good Lives Model of sexual offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77−94.
61. Ward, T., & Langlands, R. L. (2008). Restorative justice and the human rights of offenders: Convergences and divergences. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 355−372.
62. Ward, T., &Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. London: Routledge.
63. Zehr, H. (2001). Transcending: Reflections of crime victims. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
64. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: GoodBooks.
65. Zehr, H. (2005). Changing lenses (3rd edition). Scottdale, PA: Herald Press.
66. Zehr, H., & Mika, H. (1998). Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 1,47−55.
67. Zernova, M. (2007). Aspirations of restorative justice proponents and experiences of participants in family group conferences. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 491−509‌.