Bloche, M Gregg, (2002), WTO Deference to National Policy: toward an Interpretive Principle, Journal of International Economic Law, 5(4), pp.825-848.
Button, Catherine, (2004), The Power to Protect. Trade, Health and Uncertainty in the WTO, Portland, Hard Publishing.
Charnovitz, Steve, (2000), The Supervision of Health and Biosafety Regulation by World Trade Rules, Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 13(2), pp. 271-302.
Cranor, Carl F, (1993), Science Courts, Evidentiary Procedures, and Mixed Science Policy Decisions, Risk: Issues in Health and safety, 4(2), pp. 113-132.
Crawford-Brown, Douglas, Pauwelyn, Joost and Smith, Kelly, (2004), Environmental Risk, Precaution and Scientific Rationality in the Context of WTO/NAFTA Trade Rules, Risk Analysis, 24(2), pp. 461-469.
Eggers, Barbara, (2001), THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN WTO LAW, PhD Thesis. (Doctoral dissertation University of Hamburg, 2007); available at: http://dnb.info/962940709/34, last visited in 14/06/2013.
Epps, Tracey, (2008), International Trade and Health Protection. A Critical Assessment of the WTO's SPS Agreement, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Epps, Tracey, (2008), Reconciling public opinion and WTO rules under the SPS Agreement, World Trade Review, 7(2), pp. 359-392.
Foster, Caroline E, (2008), Public Opinion and the Interpretation of the world Trade Organisation's Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Journal of International Economic Law, 11(2), pp. 427-458.
Foster, Caroline E, (2005), Social Science Experts and Amicus Curiae Briefs in International Courts and Tribunals: The WTO Biotech Case, Netherlands International Law Review, 52(3), pp. 433-460.
Gruszczynski, Lukasz, (2010), Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law, A Critical analysis of the SPS Agreement, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Howse, Robert, (2000), Democracy, Science, and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization, Michigan Law Review, 98(7), pp. 2329-2357.
Howse, Robert and Mavroidis, Petros C, (2000), Europe's Evolving Regulatory Strategy for GMO's- The Issue of Consistency with WTO Law: of Kine and Brine, Fordham International Law Journal, 24(1), pp. 317-370.
Klinke, Andreas and Renn, Ortwin, (2002), A new Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management, Risk-Based, Precaution-Based, and Discourse-Based Strategies, Risk analysis, 22(6), pp. 1071-1094.
Maruyama, Warren H, (1998), A new Pillar of the WTO: Sound Science, The International Lawyer, 32(3), pp. 651-677.
McNiel, Dale E, (1998), The First Case Under the WTO's Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement: The European :union:'s Hormone Ban, Virgina Journal of International Law, 39(4), pp. 89-134.
Rayner, Steve and Cantor, Robin, (1998), 'How Fair Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice' in The Earthscan Reader in Risk and Modern Society, London, Erthscan.
Sareen, Taruna, (2001), Dictionary of Economics, New Delhi, K.S. PAPERBACKS. Vogel, David, (2001), Ships Passing in the Night: The Changing Politics of Risk
Regulation in Europe and the United States, EUI RSC Working Paper, No.2001/16; available at: www.eui.eu/RSCAS/WP-Texts/01_16.pdf, last visited in 12/02/2012. Winickoff, David, Jasanoff, Sheila, Busch, Lawrence, Grove-White, Robin and Wynne, Brian, (2005), Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Scince, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law, THE YALE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 30(81), pp. 81-123.
Council Directive 81/602/EEC of 31 July 1981, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu, (last visited in 01/05/2013).
Council Directive 88/299/EEC of 17 May 1988, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu, (last visited in 01/05/2013).
Council Directive 88/146/EEC of 7 March 1998, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu, (last visited in 01/05/2013).
Guidelines to Further the Practical Implementation of Article 5.5, available at: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/decisions06_e.htm, (last visited in 10/04/2011).
Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-third session, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty sixth session, Supplement No.10, available at: http:// untreaty.un.org/ ilc/ texts/ instruments/ english/ commentaries/ 9_7_2001.pdf, (last visited in 10/04/2011).
Australia-Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, Complaint by Canada (1995). European Communities-Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products,
Complaints by the United States, Canada, Argentina (2003). European Communities-Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), Complaint by
the United States and Canada (1996). Japan-Measures Affecting Agricultural Products, Complaint by the United States (1997). Japan-Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples, Complaint by the United States (2002). The United States-Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC-Hormones Dispute, Complaint
by European Communities (2004).