Administrative Litigations in Iran and France

Aghaei Togh, Moslem

Administrative Litigations in Iran and France

Author

Moslem Aghaei Togh

University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services

Abstract

Administrative litigation is one of the most important issues of administrative law. The purpose of distinguishing between different types of administrative litigations is to explain the judicial procedures relating to each other. According to one of the most important classifications, proposed by Edouard Laferrière in the late nineteenth century and despite criticisms has retained its importance, the administrative litigations are divided into litigations of annulment, full litigations, interpretative litigations and repression litigations. In Iran in some of the administrative law writings, the administrative litigations are classified in two categories: litigations of annulment and litigations for damage. But this classification is not comprehensive. Because in Iran there are full litigations, interpretive litigations as well as repression litigations. Comparative study of these litigations in Iran and Frnace shows us that there are differences between these four types of litigation in these countries. The main finding of this article is that although full litigation in France is extensive and includes administrative contracts as well as administrative liability, but in Iran it is limited to the disputes relating to the article 63 of the Law on the Organization and Procedure of the Court of the Administrative Justice enacted in 2013. Iranian administrative law should recognize the importance of full litigations by empowering the Court of the Administrative Justice to hear disputes relating to administrative contracts and administrative liabilities.

Keywords

References

Asso, Bernard et Frédéric Monera (2006) Contentieux administrative,
Barray, Clémence et Pierre-Xavier Boyer (2015) Contentieux administratif, Flammarion - Champs Universite.
Braibant, Guy et Bernard Stirn (2005) Le droit administratif français, 7e éd. Presses de sciences po. et dalloz.
Chapus, René (2001) Droit administrative général, tome 1, Paris: Montchrestien, 15e éd.
De Laubadére, André; Jean Claude Venezia et Yves Gaudemet (1999) Traité de droit administrative, tome 1, 15e éd, L.G.D.J.
De Laubadére, André; Venezia, Jean-Claude et Yves Gaudemet (2002) Droit Administratif, 17e éd, Paris: L.G.D.J.
Delvolvé, Pierre (2006) Le droit administratif, Paris: Dalloz, 4e edition.
Dubouis, Louis et Gustave Peiser (2007) Droit public, 18e éd, Dalloz.
Dupuis, George; Guédon Marie-José et Patrice Chrétien (2007) Droit Administratif, 10e éd, Dalloz.
Frier, Pierre Laurent et Jacues Pettt (2014) Droit administratif, Paris: LGDJ/Lextenso editions, 9e édition
HOUSER, Matthieu, Donier, Virginie et Natalie Droin (2015) Le droit administratif, Paris: Dila.
Laferriére, Édouard Louis Julien (1896) Traité de la juridiction administrative et des recours contentieux, Volume 2, Berger-Levrault, 2e éd.
Lebreton, Gilles (1996) Droit administratif général, tome 1, Paris: Armand Colin.
Lebreton, Gilles (1996) Droit administratif général, tome 2, Paris: Armand Colin.
Le Mestre, Renan (2006) Termes de droit administratif, Gualino éditeur.
Lombard, Martine et Gilles DUMONT (2007) Droit administratif, Paris: Dalloz, 7e éd.
Morand-Deviller, Jaqueline (2007) Droit administrative, 10e édition, Montchrestien.
Peiser, Gustave (2008) Droit Administratif Général, 24e éd, Paris: Dalloz.
Ricci, Jean- Claude (2004) Droit administratif, 4e éd, Hachette Livre.
Rivero, Jean (1962) “Le Huron au Palais-Royal ou réflexions naïves sur le recours pour excès de pouvoir”, Dalloz, Chronique VI, pp.37-40.
Rousset, Michel ET Olivier Rousset (2004) Droit administrative, tome 2, Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
Stirn, Bernard ET Yann Aguila (2014) Droit administratif français ET européen, Presses de sciences po et dalloz.
Waline, Jean (2008) Droit administratif, Paris: Dalloz, 22e edition.