The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The evolution of “Aut Dedere Aut Judicare” in Jurisprudence and International Documents

Document Type : p

Authors
samira mohammadi 1
Mohammad Ali Mahdavi Sabet 2
Nasrin Mehra 3
mohammad ashouri 4
1 Phd student in the field of Law, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 islamic azad university
3 Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4 Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jlvi.2024.2007266.1041
Abstract
Regardless of the amount of punishment, the impiementation of the punishment that iead to the prevention of crimes, and this is an accepted ruie in criminal law. Not only in principle is prevalent, and the doinesit arena, but also in the international arena, this the inability of the perpetrators of international crimes is always a key factor in increasing the amount of crime. “Universal jurisdictionprinciple” As an important has intered into solution to cunter the criminals of international crimes, it internationalcriminal law literature, to this way, international crimes can be coping and preveted from occurrence. “Aut dedere Aut judicare” is One of the basic topics in a large number of preforming Universal jurisdiction principle. That is processed in  international douments and preforming somehow guarantees the Universal jurisdiction principle.Because of the necessity of executing . “Aut dedere Aut judicare” onal judicial We see its diversity and flexibility in international doumentsandinternationalprocedures, So that in each casa, Various opinions have been  issued based on the above mentioned principle and ultimately this has led to serious developments in the judicial gating and procedure and even international douments. Present study by investi analyzing judicialprocedures regarding this principle and, as well as, the conventions. encompassed, developments in “Aut dedere Aut judicare” has been referred.
Keywords
universal jurisdiction
extradition
trial
international criminal law
punishment
  • Amnesty international, International Law commission: The Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare) (2009), London: February.
  • Bassiouni, M.C., & E. Wise (1995), Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Duty to Extradite or Prosecute in International Law, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Bassiouni, M.C., & E. Wise (2002), International Extradition: United States Law and Practice, New York, Oceana Publications.
  • Bassiouni, C. (1996), “Searching for Peace and Achieving Justice:The Need for Accountability”, 59 Law and Contemporary Problems ,Vol. 59, No. 4.
  • Bonini, A. (2012),“ICJ Belgium v Senegal:Temporal Issues and the Prosecution of Torture”,< ilawyerblog.com>, Last visited 13 September.
  • Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Second Phase, Judgment, I.C.J.Reports 1970
  • Belgium v Senegale,16 February 2009 invisible on <www,icj,cij,org>Last visited 5 july 2011
  • Cassese, A., & Lal Chand (2003), “Man’s Inhumanity to Man:Essay on International Law Houner of Antouio Cassese”, Hague,Kluwer Law International Publisher.
  • de Vattel (1916), The Law of Nations, translation, Fenwick,Classics of International Law,Washington D.C.,Carnegie Institution ,Book II,chapter VI.
  • Enache-Brown & Fried (1998), “Universal Crime, Jurisdiction and Duty:The Obligation of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare in International Law”,43 McGill Law Journal.
  • Final Report of the International Law Commission (2014), “The obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)”.
  • Gilbert, G. (1998), Transnational Fugitive Offenders in International Law: Extradition and Other Mechanisms, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Galickli, Second Report on the obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare),11 June 2007.
  • Grotius, H. (1925), De Jure Belli ac Pacis, translation: The Law of War and Peace,Washington,Carnegie Classics of International Law, Book II,chapter XXI.
  • Hall, S. (2006), International Law, 2nd ed., Butterworths Tutorial Series, LexisNexis Butterworths, Sydney .
  • Higgins, R. (1994), Problems and Process:International Law and How We Use It, Oxford,Clarendon Press, Bibliographic Information ,Print Publication Date: Aug 1995.
  • Keijzer (1982),“(Aut dedere, aut judicare), in Ulrich,H and D’Oliveira, J.(eds.), Netherlands Reports to the XIth International Congress of Comparative Law,Caracas 1982” Deventer,Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
  • Larsaeus (2004),“The Relationship between Safeguarding Internal Security and Complying with International Obligations of Protection:The Unresolved Issue of Excluded Asylum Seekers”, 73 Nordic Journal of International Law.
  • Meron, T. (1989), Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law , Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Miron Varouhakis, (2009), “Greek Intelligence and the Capture of PKK Leader Abdullah Ocalan in 1999,”Studies in Intelligence, No. 1.
  • Mitchell, C. (2009), AUT DEDERE ,AUT JUDICARE :The Extradite or Prosequte clause in international law, Graduate Institute Publications .
  • Question of interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial at Lockerbi,provitional Measures,Orders of 14 April 1992,I.C.J Reports1992
  • Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), Summary of the Judgment of 20 July 2012, No. 2012/4 (Para.122), Invisible on Last visited 22 September 2012.
  • Sadoff, D. A. (2016), Bringing International Fugitives to Justice:Extradition and its Alternatives, Cambridge University Press.
  • Shearer, I. A.y (1971), “ Extradition in International Law”, Manchester University Press.
  • statute of the international court of justice.

 

  • Receive Date 23 July 2023
  • Revise Date 20 January 2024
  • Accept Date 03 June 2023