The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The importance and place of judges' training in the United Nations documents and its comparison with Iran's judicial system

Authors
seied ghasem zamani
azim akbari
10.22034/jlvi.2023.703746
Abstract
The excellent position of judging in comparison with other jobs in the society cause judges do their job with high standards of professionalized and specialized to achieve this job and continue to do that. Most of these skills are acquisition and should be teached to people to prepare them for throne of judiciary. Recently, judiciaries of states pay more attention to this matter. Also because of its relevance to human law and good governance, The United Nations has many documents that considering that. Generally according to this documents judicial training departs to pre-training and in-service training. This paper will first establish importance of judicial training, kinds of this training, method of its application and training subjects in accordance with United Nations instrument and national practice of states then it will discuss situation of judicial training in Islamic republic of Iran in comparison with this documents.
Keywords
judge
Initial Training
competence
diligence
training
United Nations
    آرمان، مانی؛ خسروی، محبوبه (1392)، "اعتبارسنجی الگوی آموزش نیروی انسانی با رویکرد شایستگی"،  فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول، شماره هفتاد و یک.
    پوراحمدی لاله، محمدرضا (1387)، "مجرم، اجتماع، قاضی"، مجله وکالت، فروردین، شماره سی و پنج و سی و شش.
    دمیری، ایمان (1390)، "بررسی نحوه انتخاب قضات در کشورهای توسعه نیافته/ ظرافت‌های عملی در گزینش قضات"، مجله وکالت، اسفند، شماره سی و نه.
    شریفی، مجتبی (1381)، "نگرشی عمیق بر آموزش غیرحضوری قضات"، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، زمستان، شماره چهل و یک.
    طهماسبی، جواد (1385)، "ساختار وزارت دادگستری بلژیک"، مجله قضاوت، مهر، شماره چهلمین.
    قشلاقی، مژگان؛ حقانی، محمود؛ محمدی‌مقدم، یوسف (1394)، "نیازسنجی گروه‌های شعلی قضات براساس رویکرد شایستگی"، فصلنامه مطالعات منابع انسانی، شماره شانزدهم.
    کریمی، جابر؛ نصراصفهانی، احمدرضا؛ حاجی‌احمدی، محمود (1384)، "بررسی و مقایسه نظام آموزشی حوزه و دانشگاه"، پژوهشنامه تاریخی انقلاب اسلامی، شماره یازده و دوازده.
1- E Gravel and Q Delpech, "International labor standards: Recent developments in complementarity between international and domestic systems", 147(4), International Labor Review, 2008.
2- Hamblin, A. C., Evaluation and control of training. Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill, 1974.
3- K. M., Esterling, "Judicial Accountability the Right Way: official performance evaluations help the electorate as well as the bench", Judicature, Vol. 82, no. 5, 1998.
4- Lecce, Gail & Others; "Guidance For Promoting Judicial Independence And Impartiality", Technical Publication Series, Office of Democracy and Governmence-Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance, 2002.
5- M.D. Kirby, “Judicial Stress: An Update”, 71, Australian Law Journal,1997.

Document

6- A/70/263
7- A/HRC/11/41
8- A/HRC/11/41/Add.2.
9- A/HRC/8/4/Add.2.
10- E/CN.4/2005/60/Add.2.
11- E/CN.4/2006/52/Add.3.
12- E/CN.4/2006/52/Add.4.
13- E/CN.4/Sub.2/1985/18.
14- Commentary on The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, united nation office on drugs and crime, September 2007.
15- Knaul, Gabriela, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers to general assembly, 2015.
16- Knaul, Gabriela, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers to Human right council, Advance report on the global thematic study on human rights education and training of legal professionals, 2012.
17- Knaul, Gabriela, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers to human rights council, 2010.
18- Principles of Conduct for Court Personnel”, Report of the Fourth Meeting of the Judicial Integrity Group, 27-28 October 2005.
19- Resource Guide on Strengthening Judicial Integrity and Capacity, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna, 2011.
20- Strengthening basic principles of judicial conduct, Annex, Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, ECOSOC 2006/23