The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Application of the Principle of Proportionality of Bone Injuries and the Amount of Compensation, from the determination of compensation by the Expert to Comparison and Judgment by the Judge

Authors
1 Ayatollah Haira National University
2 General Directorate of Forensic Medicine
Abstract
The lawmaker has determined the amount of compensation for bone injuries in accordance with the type of the injuries, however, the degree of those injuries in terms of seriousness has not been determined. As determining the injuries is an expert job it is to be done by experts as per Article 139, civil procedure code and here no role other than issuing judgment based on the opinion of the expert is defined for the judge. Categorizing the degree of injuries from severe to minor together with the Principle of proportionality of the degree of an injury and the amount of compensation can be useful as a criterion for judges to examine the opinions of experts of forensic medicine as a judicial precedent now as well as future legislative reforms. Formulating the mentioned principle for the determination of compensation or determination of diyah for body parts with no specified diyah will be useful as an objective criterion. After studying and analyzing books and documents, we came to the conclusion that bone injuries in order of seriousness are: an avulsion fracture, comminuted fracture, simple fracture, hairline fracture, dislocation, and bone-clearing wound. This order must be taken into consideration on one hand by the experts of forensic medicine at the level of determining the degree of an injury and also determining the compensation proportionated to the specified diyah for mentioned injuries and on the other hand by judges at the level of comparing the opinion of experts with the provided principle.
 
Keywords

1. Ibn Manzoor, Abu al-Fadl, Jamal al-Din, Muhammad ibn Makram. (1414). Arabic Language, 15 volumes, third, Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr for Printing, Publishing and Distribution - Dar Sader.
2. Isfahani, Hussein bin Muhammad Ragheb. (1412). Vocabulary of Quranic words, in one volume, first, Lebanon-Syria: Dar Al-Alam - Al-Dar Al-Shamiya.
3. Alami Harandi et al., Bahador. (1392). Textbook of Orthopedics and Fractures, one volume, first, Tehran: Andisheh Rafi Publishing.
4. Great Plain, Ahmad. (1392). "Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis in children: a study of hangover in Ahvaz hospitals", Iranian Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spring, Volume 11, Number 2.
5. Zanjani, Abbas Ali Amid. (1421). Political Jurisprudence (Amid), 3 volumes, fourth, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications.
6. Sarikhani, Adel, Shakir, Mohammad Hossein, Mousavi, Seyed Ibrahim, (1398). "Bone Fracture Redemption Criterion", Judicial Law Perspectives Quarterly, Volume 24, Number 86.
7. Shaker, Mohammad Hussein, Bai, Hossein Ali. (1395). "Comparative study of bone dislocation rule in jurisprudence and subject law", Quarterly Journal of Medical Jurisprudence, Fall and Winter, Year 8, No. 82 and 82.
8. Abdoltifti, Abbas, et al. (1393). "A case report of fibula bone deformity plastic", Journal of Knowledge and Health, Winter, Volume 9, Number 4.
9. Andalib Hamedani, Mohammad, Sotoudeh, Hamid. (1391). "The Taste of Sharia Research in Validation and Efficiency", Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) Jurisprudence Magazine, Summer and Autumn, No. 70 and 71.
10. Fayumi, Ahmad bin Muhammad Muqari. (Without). Al-Misbah Al-Munir in Gharib Al-Sharh Al-Kabir for Rafi'i, in one volume, first, Qom: Dar Al-Razi Publications.
11. Reading, Mohsen. (1383). Tafsir Noor, 11th, Tehran: Cultural Center for Lessons from the Quran.
12. Katozian, Nasser, (1376). "The place of Islamic law in the legal order", Legal Journal of Justice, Autumn, No. 21.
13. Wasiti, Zubaydi, Hanafi, Moheb al-Din, Sayyid Muhammad Murtaza Husseini. (1414). The Crown of the Bride from the Jewel of the Dictionary, 20 volumes, first, Beirut-Lebanon: House of Thought for Printing, Publishing and Distribution.