The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Universality or Relativism: A Critique of Religious Intellectual Approach to Human Rights in the Light of Islamic Approach

Authors
Sayed Taha Mousavi Mirkalayee 1
Reza Zabib 2
1 University of Judicial Sciences
2 Ministery of Foreign Affairs
Abstract
This article contains a critique of the religious intellectual approach to human rights from the perspective of universality or relativism and organizes this critique in the light of Islamic principles. The intellectual-religious approach to human rights begins with the ideological assumptions of this movement and is defined between Islamic and Western approaches. The Western approach claims the universality and transcendence of human rights. The Islamic approach, while emphasizing on the Human Nature, believes too in universality of human rights; but first, it disagrees with western approach on the nature of the Rights and secondly, it takes into account some sort of relativism as a subsidiary approach to the issue. Meanwhile, Religious Intellectualism, in spite of basically relying on the philosophical foundations of relativism, admires Western universality of human rights. The authors, using Descriptive–Analitical Method, try to provide a critique to this duality under the dialectic between Islam and western human rights and answer to the question that what are the criticisms on the Religious Intellectuals approach to human rifgts in the light of Islamic principles and between the two approaches of universality and relativism?
 
Keywords
Human Rights. Islam. Relativism. Religious Intellectualism. Universality
47. Dallmayer, Fred.(1993). The other Heidegger. First Edition. NewYork: Cornell University Press.
48. Dellavalle, Sergio.(2010). “Beyond Particularism: Remarks on Some Resent Approaches to the Idea of a Universal Political and Legal Order”. The European Journal of International Law. Vol. 21. No. 3. Pp.765-789.
49. Hamilton, Peter.(1992). “The Enlightenment and the Birth of Social Science”. In: Hall and Gieben. Formations of Modernity. First Edition. Cambridge: The Open University Press. Pp. 11-29.

50. Islam, Samir.(2014). “The Negative Effects of Ill-Advised Legislation: The Curious Case of the Evolution of Anti-Shara Law Legislation into Anti-Foreign Law Legislation and the Impact on the CISG”. Howard Law Journal. Vol. 57(3). Pp.979-1031.

51. Kabasakal Arat, Zehra F.(2008). “Human Rights Ideology and Dimensions of Power: A Radical Approach to the State, Property and Discrimination”. Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 30. No. 3. Pp.906-932.

52. Kedourie, Elie.(1980). Islam in the Modern World. First Edition. London: Mansell.

53. Quraishi, Asifa.(2008). “Who Says Shari'a Demands the Stoning of Women? A Description of Islamic Law and Constitutionalism”. Berkeley Journal of Middle East & Islamic Law. Vol. 1. Pp.163-189.

54. Sachedina, Abdulaziz.(1983). “Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian Revolution”. In: Esposito, John L. Voices of Resurgence. First Edition. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
55. Shestack, Jerome J.(1998). “The Philosophic Foundations of Human Rights”. Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 20. Pp.201-234.
56. Thompson, John B.(1996). “Tradition and Self in a Mediated World”. In: Heelas, Lash and Morris. Detraditionalization. First Edition. Cambridge: Blackwell. Pp. 88-119.
57. Vatimo, Gianni.(1988). The End of Modernity. First Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.