The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Application of Compatibility Provision and More Favourable Right Provisions in New York Convention: A Modern View

Authors
Ayyoub Mansouri Razi 1
Seyed Morteza Hosseini 2
1 university of Tehran
2 Islamic Azad University
Abstract
lity provision are contemplated in New York convention. When a country implements New York Convention, the arisen question is that if someone can invoke more favorable provisions of both convention and domestic laws for enforcement and recognition of an arbitral award. To deal with this question conventional award and in particular non-domestic ones must be clarified. Then by choosing legal regime of a country, the convention provisions should be compared with those of that country.  In Belgium rules applicable on recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards are amended in accordance with UNCITRAL model law in 2013. Thus, Belgian legal regime is selected. Findings show that if there is a foreign factor in parties` relationship. issued award in the country of origin is viewed as non-domestic. In the process of recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award the more favorable rules of both convention and domestic laws can be invoked.
Keywords
New York Convention
Non-domestic arbitral award
More favorable right proition
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award
11. Hanotiou,Bernard ,1997, “Le execution en Belgique des sentences arbitrales etrangeres”,.Belgium, Journal des Tribunaux , No 25
12. Bermann,George A,2015 ,Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards : The Application of The New York Convention By National Courts ,New York, springer.
12. Carbonneau,Thomas E ,1998; “Debating the Proper Role of National Law Under New York Convention”, Tulane Journal of International&Comparative Law,Vol 6 , 277-290.
13. Cheung ,Christina,2012 , “The Enforcement Methodology of Non-Domestic Arbitral Awards Rendered in the United States & Foreign Related Arbitral Awards Rendered in the People's Republic of China pursuant to Domestic Law and the New York Convention”, SANTA CLARA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW , Vol 11, 237-265.
14. Gharavi,Hamid& Liebscher, Christoph, 2002, The International Effectiveness of the Annulment of an Arbitral Award,The Netherland, Kluwer Law International.
15. Gaillard,Emmanual,1999 ,”The Enforcement of Awards set aside in the country of origin” , ICSID Review, 1999 , vol 16 ,16- 45
16. Kayali ,Didem,2010, “Enforceability of Multi-tiered dispute Resolution Clauses” ,Journal of International Arbitration , Vol27(6),pp 551-577
17. Lorenzen ,Ernest G ,1935, “Commercial Arbitration, Enforcement of Foreign Awards” , Yale Law Journal , vol 45, 39-68
18. Mayer,Ulrich C,1998, “The Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards;Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation of the 1985 New York Convention” ,Uniforn Law Studies - 1998- 2/3.
19. Paulsson, Jan ,1997; “Rediscovering the New York convention: Further Reflections on Chromalloy” , 12 Mealey`s International Arbitration , Report20,24.
20. Philippe,Denis , 2014, “Modernisation of the Belgian Law on Arbitration”, de droit des affairs , no 109 , 5- 20
21. Scott, Susan V& Markos Zachariadis,2010, Origins and development of the global SWIFT network, 1973-2009, Department of Management Information systems and innovation Group London school of economics and political science, working paper series.
22. Van den Berg , Albert Jan,2014; Should the Setting Aside of the Arbitral Award be Abolished, , ICSID review Journal, Oxford University Press, sit053, , 1-26 .
23. Van den Berg, Albert Jan,1981, The New York Convention of 1958 , The Netherland, Kluwer Law International.
24. Van den Berg, Albert Jan,1985 , “When Is an Arbitral Award Nondomestic Under the New York Convention of 1958? “,Pace Law Review , Volume 6,25-41
25. Van den berg, Albert Jan,2008 , The New York Convention of 1958: An Overview, U.K., Cameron Publication.
26. Van Hautte, Hans &Valgaeren,Erik,1998 ,”The Enforcement Procedure of Foreign Arbitral Award in Belgium”, Arbitration International, Vol 14, 431- 446.
27. Volz Jane L&Haydock,Roger S,1996 ,” Foreign Arbitral Awards: enforcing the Award against the recalcitrant loser”; William Mitchell Law review Journal , vol 21 , 868- 937.
28. zhang ,Bingnan,2014 , Recognition and Enforcement of foreign arbitral Award in China and Grounds for Refusal In The Context of the New York Convention, Belgium ,Universiteit Gent.