The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Necessity of Prior Notice in Administrative Decisions by looking at French law

Author
Saeed Khani Valizadeh
Abstract
The right to be heard as one of the main elements of the principle of right of defense,is one of the important rights that, particularly in recent decades, has been taken into consideration in administrative law, and plays a special role in protecting the rights and interests of citizens affected by administrative decisions. It should be noted that this principle and the necessity of its observance, despite certain differences, has been accepted in Iranian and French legal systems. One of the issues related to the right to be heard is prior notice to an interested person about an imminent decision-making process that may threaten his rights and interests. In this paper, it is attempted to present the analysis in order to apply this issue in Iranian administrative law, while expressing the status of prior notice in decision-makings and necessity of this subject in Iranian and French administrative laws.
Keywords
Rights of defense
Prior notice
Administrative decision
Council of State
Administrative Court of Justice
 Bonnefous, E. (1958). La réforme administrative. Paris: P.U.F.
 Braibant, G. Questiaux N. WIENER C. (1974). Le contrôle de l'administration et la protection des citoyens, Paris: Cujas.
 EISENBERG E. (2000). L'audition du citoyen et motivation des décisions administratives individuelles. Étude comparative en France et en Allemagne. Paris: L'Harmattan.
 Ferrier, J-P. (1974). «La participation des administrés aux décisions de l’administration ». R.D.P.
 Grewe, C. Ruiz Fabri. H. (1995). Droits constitutionnels européens. Paris: P.U.F.
 Hostiou, R. (1975). Procédure et formes de l'acte administratif unilatéral en Droit français. Paris: L.G.D.J.
 Isaac, G. (1968). La procédure administrative non contentieuse. Paris: L.G.D.J.
 Lebreton, G. (2017). Droit administratif general. Paris: Dalloz.
 Maillard Desgrées du Loû, D. (2000). Droit des relations de l’administration avec usagers. Paris: PUF.
 Manesse, J., (1976). Le problème de la motivation des décisions administratives. These. Paris.
 Morange, G. (1978). Le secret en droit public français. Dalloz.
 Mourgeon, J. (1967). La répression administrative. Paris: L.G.D.J.
 Odent, R. (1953). «Les droits de la defense». E.D.C.E.
 Odent, R. (1980). Contentieux administrative. Les cours de droit. Paris: Dalloz.
 Rivero, J. (1995). «L'administré face au droit administratif». A.J.D.A.
 Stassinopoulos, M. (1976). Le droit de la défense devant les autorités administratives. Paris: L.G.D.J.

انگلیسی
 Wiener, C. (1975). Vers une codification de la procédure administrative. Paris: P.U.F.
 Zeghbib, H. (1998). «Principe du contradictoire et procédure administrative non contentieuse». R.D.P.