The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Law of evidence in administrative proceeding

Authors
Abstract
Law of evidence in administrative proceeding, has an undeniable significance to guarantee citizens’ rights and freedoms and to guarantee the principle of “Rule of Law” . By predicting the system of  free law of evidence in administrative proceeding, this opportunity will be provided for citizens to use all reasonable evidences to reach their rights and get disengaged from the usual current limits in the system of  legal law of evidence . From the other side, imposing the burden of proof on a citizen who claiming violation of the principle of  “Rule of Law”  by the administration department will be a crucial obstacle in realization of administrative proceeding targets, thus this is necessary to adjust the rule of “ the burden of proof by the claimant” in administrative proceeding and make the administrative  department “responsible” too in a way that the administrative office be obliged to clarify and explain the appealed decision reasonably and on a basis. Of other necessary mechanisms for 
realization of administrative proceeding targets is to predict the active participation of the administrative judge to discover reality and to enforce justice. The administrative judge should do the necessary researches to make sure of realization of the principle of “ Rule of Law” so that by this arrangement the inequality between the administrative department and  the citizen in the  administrative proceedings get compensated to some extent and the citizens’ rights and freedoms get guaranteed.
 
Keywords

Asimow, Micheal and Dotan ,Yoav(2016) “Open and Closed Judicial Review of Agency Action:The Conflicting U.S. and Israeli Approaches”, The American Journal Of Comparative Law, Vol. 64, November 9.
Bowman, Harold.M (1906),”American administrative tribunals”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol.21,No.4,dec.
Cane, Peter(1992), “ In Introduction to Administrative Law”, Second Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Davis, Kenneth culp(1942), “An Approach to Problems of Evidence in the Administrative process”, Harvard Law Review. Vol.55. No.3. Jan.
De Villiers, Bertus(2013), “Burden of proof and standard of proof in the WA state administrative tribunal- a case of horses for courses”, university of Queensland Law Journal, vol 32(1).
Frydman, M Patrick,(2008) “Aministrative Justice In Franc”, 11th Annual AIJA Tribunals Conference , in association with the Council of Australasian Tribunals, 5-6 June.
Gellhorn, Ernest(1971) ”Rules of evidence and official notice in formal administrative hearings” ,Duke Law Journal, number1.
Glicksman, Eliot B(1999), “The Modern Hearsay Rule Should Find Administrative Law Application”, Nebraska Law Review, vol78.
Groves, Matthew and Lee, H.P.(2007), “Australian Administrative Law: Fundamentals, Principles and Doctorines”, Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, Laverne and Baglay, Sasha and Kwok, Melissa and Mavrikkou, Maria and Tay, Ki lin,(2011) “The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives Research Workshop Report”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice, Vol. 24.
Kuehnle ,WillIam.H(2005), “Standard of Evidence in Administrative Proceedings”, New York Law School Law Review, vol 49.
Nason,Sarah(2015) ” Understanding administrative justice in wales: Full report including executive summary”, Bangor University, November 2015.
Pierce,Jr, Richard J and Shapiro,Sidney A and Verkuil, Paul R(2004), “Administrative law and process”, Fourth Eition, Foundation press, New York.
Utton, Albert,E(1979), ”The use of the substantial evidence rule to review administrative findings of fact in New Mexico”, New Mexico Law Review,winter.
Wade, H.W.R(1977),” Administrative Law”, Fourth edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Yardley, D.C.M(1986), “Principles of Administrative law”, second edition,London, Butterworths.