The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

al Remedies and Judicial Immunity of States: The International Court of Justice Jurisprudence

Author
Sayyed Hosein Sadatmeydani
Tehran University
Abstract
The conflict between the rights of States as the primary subjects of international law on the one hand and the rights of individuals as the subsidiary subjects of this legal corpus on the other hand is crystallized in the twenty-first century. Among others, the conflict between the right of individuals to have access to judicial remedies and States immunity from national judicial jurisdiction is noteworthy. In the recent years, having a humanitarian approach in mind, it has been argued that according to general international law, States or governmental officials cannot invoke to immunity, if and when the subject matter of a case is related to an exceptional and grave crimes. This argument has supported or disapproved both at the national and international level.

The dispute between Germany and Italy arising from Italians claims related to crimes committed during the second world war, has provided the opportunity for judicial pronouncement on such an argument. This article through categorizing different issues is analyzing the judgment of the International Court of Justice. A review of the judgment indicates that the Court as the highest judicial body has based its judgment on State practice rather than judicial logics. The Court by rejecting the legal doctrines, taking into account the State practice has confirmed the State immunity in cases related to Human Rights or Humanitarian Law. Putting aside the moral evaluations, the Court's judgment is a precious asset for the international legal order and the stability in international relations.
Keywords
Legal Remedies
state immunity
Serious Violation of Human rights and Humanitarian Law
International Court of Justice
Bianchi, A., (1993), Denying State Immunity to Violators of Human Rights, Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht; vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 195-229.
Bröhmer, Jürgen, (1997), State Immunity and the Violation of Human Rights, Nijhoff.
De Sena, Pasquale, (1997), Immunity of State Organs and Defence of Superior Orders as an Obstacle to the Domestic Enforcement of International Human Rights, in: Enforcing International Human Rights in Domestic Courts / ed. by Benedetto Conforti and Francesco Francioni.
Karagiannakis, Magdalini, (1998), State Immunity and Fundamental Human Rights, Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9-43.
O'Keefe, Roger, (2011), State Immunity and Human Rights: Heads and Walls, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 999-1045 .
De Sena, Pasquale and De Vittor, Francesco, (2005), State Immunity and Human Rights: The Italian Supreme Court Decision on the Ferrini Case, European Journal of International Law, vol. 16, no., pp. 89-112.
Baker, J. Craig, (1999), The Future of Former Head of State Immunity after ex parte Pinochet, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 937-949.
Nanda, Ved P., (1999), Human Rights and Sovereign and Individual Immunities (Soverign Immunity, Act of State, Head of State Immunity and Diplomatic Immunity) – Some Reflections, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.467-479.
Akande, Dapo and Shah, Sangeeta, (2010), Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts, EJIL, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 815–852.
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, (2002), State Immunity in National and International Law: Three Cases before the European Court of Human Rights, Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 703-714.
Pittrof, Sabine, (2004), Compensation Claims for Human Rights Breaches Committed by German Armed Forces Abroad During the Second World War: Federal Court of Justice Hands Down Decision in the Distomo Case, German Law Journal, vol. 05 no. 1, pp. 15-21.
Tomuschat, Christian, (2011), The International Law of State Immunity and Its Development By National Institutions, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1105-1140.
Fox, Hazel, (2008), The Law of State Immunity, 2nd ed / Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 569-591.
Potestà, Michele, (2010), State Immunity and Jus Cogens Violations : the Alien Tort Statute against the Backdrop of the Latest Developments in the "Law of Nations", Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 28, no. 2, 2010, pp. 571-586.
Adams, Wendy, (2001), In Search of a Defence of the Transnational Human Rights Paradigm: may Jus Cogens Norms be invoked to create Implied Exceptions in Domestic State Immunity Statutes?, in: Torture as Tort: Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Human Rights Litigation / ed. by Craig Scott.
Caplan, Lee M., (2003), State Immunity, Human Rights and "jus cogens" : a Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory, American Journal of International Law, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 741-781.
Messineo, Francesco, Italian Constitutional Court Judgment 238/2014 declares customary international law on state immunity inapplicable in the Italian legal order as far as war crimes and crimes against humanity are concerned, 24 Octobr 2014, http://www.qil-qdi.org/summary-prepared-by-the-editorial-board-of-qil-qil-will-devote-in-the-following-weeks-a-zoom-out-to-the-legal-issues-arising-from-the-italian-constitutional-court-no-2382014/ .
See: Bianchi, Andrea, On Certainty, EJILtalk, 16 February 2012, Available here: http://www.ejiltalk.org/on-certainty .
Keitner, Chimène, Germany v. Italy: A View from the United States, EJIL talk, 15 February 2012, Available here:
http://www.ejiltalk.org/germany-v-italy-a-view-from-the-united-states
Vivekananthan, Niranjini, (1996), The Doctrine of State Immunity and Human Rights Violations of Forign States, Sri Lanka Journal of International Law; vol. 8, no. June, pp. 125-150.
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening), Judgment of 3 February 2012; Available here: http://www.icjcij.org/docket/files/143/16883.pdf.
Ferrini v Germany, Appeal decision, no 5044/4; ILDC 19 (IT 2004) 11 March 2004; Available here: http://www.adh-geneva.ch/RULAC/pdf_state/Ferrini.pdf .
Greek Citizens v. Federal Republic of Germany (The Distomo Massacre Case), 42 ILM 2003, 1030.
Greek Citizens v. Federal Republic of Germany, Case No. III ZR 245/98, ILR, vol. 129, p. 556.
North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports, 1969.
Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1985.
United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, 2004; Available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/4_1_2004.pdf.
Arrest Warrant (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium), I.C.J. Reports 2002.
Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1991, Vol. II (2), p. 45; United Nations doc. A/C.6/59/SR.13.
Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom, Application No. 35763/97, Judgment of 21 November 2001, ECHR Reports 2001-XI, p. 101, para. 61; ILR, Vol. 123, p. 24; Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,ECHR,,KWT,4562d8cf2,3fe6c7b54,0.html.
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2006.
Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2002.
Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2008.
Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2001, vol. II, Part Two, p. 94. Available also here: http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/ texts/ instruments/ english/ commentaries / 9_6_2001 pdf .
http://www.diritticomparati.it/2014/10/sentenza-n-238-anno-2014-repubblica-italiana-in-nome-del-popolo-italiano-la-corte-costituzionale-composta-dai-signori.html.