The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The war crimes perpetrated by human dignity and the atrocious behavior of the prisoners of holy defence at Camp 9 in Iraq

Authors
F. Jaffari 1
A. Mohebbi 2
1 Faculty Member of University of Boo Ali Sina of Hamedan
2 Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Abstract
In this article, one of the examples of war crimes is the destruction of human dignity, especially behavior and destruction and degradation. The crimes set forth in paragraph 21 of Part 2 of Article 8 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court are foreseen. Although the war crimes that took place at Camp 9 are not limited to this crime, the crimes of human dignity, especially destructive and humiliating behaviors, have been particularly studied. From the perspective of international humanitarian law, warlords abandon certain rights. Including their rights under the Third Geneva Convention, the right to access to health facilities. Lacking awareness of health facilities for fighters may lead to illness in prisons, and degrading behaviors. International law of international law International law of international law shows that the provision of minimum conditions for disputes in prison camps or prisoners is one of the examples of inhuman treatment and remission and destruction. 
Keywords
کمپ نهم عراق
جنایت جنگی
رفتار توهین‌آمیز و تحقیر کننده
کنوانسیون سوم ژنو
اساسنامه رم. 89/5000 آیا منظور شما این است: کمپ نه عراق
-Books
1. Commentary to Geneva Convention III, Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, published under the general editorship of Jean S. Pictet, Doctor of Lam Director for General Affairs of the International Committee of the Red Cross, International Committee of the Red Cross, 1960.
2. S.Davidson, “American System of Human Rights (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998).
Cases:
3. Aleksovski (IT-95-14/1-T), judgment 25 june 1999.
4. The European Convention of Human Rights.
5. Rome statute of International Criminal Court.
6. ArzundaGliboa v. Uruguay, Communication No.147/1988, /41/40.
7. Chuichi -Tanaka Chuichi and Other Case vol. XIII.
8. Conetris v. Urugay, A/40/40, Parars.9.2-10, pp.201-2.
9. ECtHR , Ireland v. UK, Vol.25,p.96;58ILR188at 239.
10. ECtHRThe Greek case, (1972)12 Year Book of the Convention on Human Rights, p. 186.
11. ECtHR, East African P. 76;C M D H (77).
12. ECtHR, Hurtado v. Switzerland, Judgments and Decisions Vol280-A.P.14.
13. ECtHR, Ireland v. UK: Judgment and Decisions, vol.25 , p.65;58 ILR 188 at 264
14. ECtHR, Judgments and Decisions Vol, 26, pp.16 ff ILR 339 at 354-5.
15. ECtHR, the Greek case.
16. ECtHR, Vol,26, para 29, p 14;58 ILR 339 at 352.
17. Elements of crimes.
18. Furunzija (It-95-17/1-t), Judgment, 10 december 1998.
19. Geneva Convention III, Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War.
20. ICTY, Judment IT.95-14/1-T.
21. ICTY, Judment, IT.96-23 and IT 96-23/1-T.
22. ICTY.Prosecutor’s Pre-trail, IT.96-23-PT.PP.28ff.
23. Kunarak et al(IT-96-23/1-A) Jedgment, 12 june 2002.
24. Kunarak et al(IT-96-23/1-A) Jedgment, 22 february 2001.
25. Musema (ICTR- 01/04-01/07), judgment and sentence, 28 january 2000.
26. Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its activities during the Second World War, Vol. I, p. 263.
27. The European Court of Human Rights, Caseof S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria, Judgment, 07/03/2018.