The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Eliminating the death penalty from drug crimes: requirements and Prohibitions

Authors
mohammadreza saki
salman koonani
Abstract
The Ideaof the capability of the death penalty to deal with drug-related crimes is, in essence, a guarantor of the goal of safeguarding human capital and social values. Certainly, Use of the death penalty can be accepted in response to some of the narcotics crimes. But there are many other crimes that follow the death penalty, but they can be categorically opposed and unsuccessful. Execution isn’t a pearl in the shell of criminal justice, and Penalties are never alone in being able to dismantle the thorns of Legislatures and Normative- Oriented Garden.
 Review of the Law on the Incorporation of an Article into the Anti-Narcotic Law, acted on 12/7/1396, which refers to "Death Penalty reducing" in public affairs, indicates that Iran's criminal policy in this new regulation does not necessarily exclude the death penalty. Even in some cases, it has an incremental approach. This regulation has been tightened up in the context of a strict criminal policy, in which it remains firmly convinced of the deterrent effect of execution.
 
Keywords
Execution
Drug and Psychotropic Crimes
Jurisprudential Foundations
Penology- Oriented and legal criticisms
Challenges and Ambiguities
 Anglin, M.D and Speckart, G.R. (1988). Narcotics Use and Crime; A Multisample, Multimethod analysis. Criminology. Vol 26.
 Ashworth, A. (1999). Principles of Criminal Law. Oxford University press.
 Andrew, V.H. (1976). Doing Justice; the Choice of punishment. first edition. New York.
 Boonin, D. (2008). The Problem of Punishment. Cambridge University press.
 Bedau, H. (1997). the Death Penalty in America. New York: Oxford university press.
 Bennett, T and Holloway, K. (2005). Understanding drugs. alchol and Crime. New York: Open University press.
 Cary, P.CL. (2005). death Penalty on Trial. Oxford: ABC publishing.
 Fridell, R. (2004). Capital Punishment. New York: Marshal Cavendish.
 Duff, R.A; (1986). Trials and Punishment. Cambridge University press.
 Gwen, R, and Crow, I. (2009). Offender Rehabilitation: Theory, Research and Practice. London: Sage Publication.
 Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and Modern Society. Oxford University press.
 Haney, C. (2005). Reforming Punishment: Psychological Limits to the Pains of Imprisonment. American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.
 Hanson, R.K, et al. (2009). The Principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A Meta– analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior.
 Hughes, G. (1998). Understanding Crime Prevention. Buckingham: Open University Press.
 Jamieson, A. (1994). Terrorism and Drug trafficking in the 1990s. Darmouth.
 Johnson, H. (2004). Drugs and Vrime: a Study of incarceration female offenders. Australian institute of Criminology.
 Kaye, S. (2008). the Debate abouth the Death Penalty. New York: the rosoen publishing.
 Melusky, J.A and Keith, A.P; (2011). Capital Punishment. Oxford: Greenwood press.
 McGuire, J. (2002). Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective programmes and policies to Reduce Reoffending. John Wiley andsons publication.
 Pollock, M.J. (2013). Criminal Law, Tenth edition, London: Elsevier Publisher.
 Raynor, P, and Robinson, G. (2005). Rehabilitation, Crime and Justice. UK: Macmillan publishing.
 Thomas, C.R; (2006). Federal Narcotics Law and the War on Drugs. London: Routledge.
 Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University press.
 Williams, M.E. (2002). the Death Penalty. Green haven press.
 Walker, I. (2008). the Death Penalty. Minnesota. ABDO Publishing Company.