The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Consept of tort and its role in structure of division of tort law

Authors
Iraj babaei 1
Smaeil keshavarz safiyi 2
1 allameh tabatabayi university
2 azad university
Abstract
Concept of delict(Tort) in Roman Law on the base of Deontology as a ethical theory is recognized in the concept of  breach of first Duty and structure of category in this legal system is formed on the base of Obligation and Responsibility as a secondary of breach of first Obligation.in contrast in Common Law and Jurisprudence, concept of Tort in accordance to ethical theory of teleology is difinited as breach of Right.in Jurisprodence, delict doesn’t recognize as source of structure of tort law but  Causes of Violence of right is source of structure of tort law   . In law of Iran , because of iffecting of Roman law and Jurisprodence , Tort Law structure has antithetic  mixture of Breach of Duty and Violence of Right . resolving this problem involves final choosing one of perspectives. It seems Jurisprodential perspective that is based violence of Right,is appropriate for Establishing of iran structure of tort law.

 
Keywords
Deontology
consequencialism
breach of duty
violence of right
Tort
1- Rev.Dr.M.Stephen- Christian Ethics, Issues and Insights-Ashok Kumar mittal-2007.
2- Birks-peter - The Roman Law of Obligations- Oxford University Press-2014.
3- Buhofer Stephen P. - Structuring the Law: The Common Law and the Roman Institutional System- Swiss Review of International and European Law SRIEL/SZIER/RSDIE 5/2007.
4- Bridge-Michael-The Overlap of Tort and Contract-WABASSO-1982.
5- Konard Zweigert and Hein Kotz-Intriductionto comparative Law-Oxford-1987.
6- Cairns J.W and du Plessis.P.J-Beyond Dogmatics- Law and Society in the Roman World- Edinburgh University Press-2007.
7- R. W. Lee- Torts and Delicts- The Yale Law Journal- Vol. 27, No. 6 (Apr., 1918.
8- Hall-Jeromy-Interrelation of Criminal Law and Tort-Columbia Law Review-1943.
9- Terry-t. Herry-Duties Rights and Wrongs-AmericanBar Association-Voll.No2—1924.
10- S. F. C. MILSOM, Historical Foundations of the Common Law –Londen Butterworths (2nd ed. 1981.
11- The Oxford Edition of Blackstone's: Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book I Chapter 1,-2016.
12- Mitch ell-Paul-A History of Tort Law1900–1950-Cambridge University Press-2015.
13-. Winfield, The Province of the Law of Tort (Cambridge University Press, 1931.
14- F. Pollock, The Law of Torts, 6th edn (London, Stevens and Sons, Eleventh Edition 1920.
15- Edwards-Linda-Edwards-Stanly/Kitly Wells-Patricia-Tort Law-Delmar Cengage L:earning-2012.
16- Kenneth W Simons-Deontology, negligence, tort, and crime-University of California-1996.
17- Tunk-Andre- Encyclepedia of comparative law-Torts- chapter one- introduction-Martinus nijhoff publishers.
18- Descheemaeker- Eric - The Division of Wrongs: A Historical Comparative Study- Oxford University Press-2009.
19- Tunc_Andre- A Codified Law of Tort - The French Experience- Louisiana Law Review-vol 39 La. L. Rev. (1979.
20- Tomlinson- Edward A- Tort Liability in France for the Act of Things: A Study of Judicial Lawmaking- Louisiana Law Review- Volume 48|Number 6- July 1988.
21- Birks-peter-Concept of civil wrongs from:Philosophical foundations of tort law-Oxford university press-1995.
22- Eric Descheemaeker - The Roman Division of Wrongs: A New Hypothesis- University of Edinburgh - School of Law- February-2012.
23- Cooke- John- Law of Tort-pearson-2011.
24- Mazeaud(henri Leon Jean)-Lecons de Droit civil.Obligation- Montchrestien-1998.
25- Laurent-(f)-Principes de droit civil francias.T.201.ed.A.durant et Pedone Lauriel.1876.