The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Criminal liability of legal Persons in Iran and the French penal system

Author
mohsen sharifi
Institute Tabarestan
Abstract
Until the late 20th century, assigning the criminal liability to the legal persons Until the late 20th century, assigning the criminal liability to the legal persons was ambiguous and rejected obviously in most legal systems for a variety of reasons such as:  legal persons are artificial and lack criminal mansuetude, lack of proportion between the crimes and punishments, lack of realization of the penalty goals specifically regeneration, breaching the penalty of being personal and breaching the principle of expertise. However, social requirements and the ever-increasing role of the legal entities in social developments as well as possessing dangerous sources and widely involvement in criminal activities including economic, industrial, environmental, health, transportation, crimes against people and security, and inefficiency of non-criminal sanctions in preventing the crimes made it necessary to assign them criminal liability. What made gradually the reasons of the opponents of the legal persons’ criminal liability ineffective were: assuming them as an independent identity and believing in being dominated by a collective will and prediction of sanctions along with the nature of these identities such as dissolution as a penalty equal to hanging a real person or judicial watch in order to meet retrieving purposes. Based on this reality, the French criminal system in 1992 and about two decades later in Iran (2013) accepted the criminal liability of the legal identities as a rule rather than as an exception. In this paper, we are going to answer the following questions: does the liability in the two systems cover various kinds of public and private persons or is it restricted to just private identities? Is the persons’ liability direct or indirect? What are conditions for realization of the liability? Are the assignable crimes to the legal persons restricted or widespread? What are the assignable crimes? Are they various and appropriate?
 
Keywords
legal persons
Criminal Liability
Crime Penalty
Iranian criminal system
French criminal system
Belghoul, Fabrice (2004); L'extension de la Responsabilité Pénale des Personnes Moral, Mémoire du Dea de Droit Economique et des Affaires d'orléams.
Caille, Responsabilité Pénale des Personnes Morales de Droit Public, Juris Classeur Administratif, Fasc, 2007.
Deckert, K (2011); Corporate Criminal Liability in France in: Pieth, Mark pieth & Ivory, Radha; Corporate Criminal Liability, Springer.
Desportes, F (2002); Responsabilité Pénale des Personnes Morales, jurisClasseur Sociétés Traité, Fasc.
Gobert, J, (2007); The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, Thirteen Years in the Making but was it Worth the Wait? , Modern Law Review.
Dressier, Joshua (2007); Cases and Material on Criminal Law 916, 4th ed.
Gritter, E (2007); ‘D Sttrafbaarheid Van De Rechtspersoon, in: J. B. J. Van Der Leij (ed), Plegen en Deelnmen, Deventer.
Gruner, Richaed (1994); Corporate Crime and Sentencing 1sted.
Hasnas, J (2009); The Centenary of Mistake: One Handred Yers of Corporate Criminal Liability, American Criminal Law Rwview.
Israel Et Al, Jerold (2009); White Collar Crime: Law and Practice, 3rd ed.
Le Gunehec, F (2001); Peines Applicables Aux Personnes Morales. - Peines Criminelles et Correctionnelles (C. Pén. Art, 131-37a 131-39et 131-45a 131-49), JurisClasseur, Pénal, Fasc,10.
Marchéal, J; J-Y (2010); Peines applicables aux Personnes Morales. Peines Criminalles et Correctionnellas, JurisClasseur Sociétés Traité, Art.
Peradel, Jean (2007); Droit Pénal Général, éd, Cujas.
Pieth M & Ivory R (2011); Emergence and Convergenre: Corporate Criminal Liability Principlein Overview Volume 9, Springer.
Pieth, M (2007); Introduction, in: M. Pieth, L,A. Law, and P. J, Cullen (eds), The OECD Convention on Bribery: A Commentary, Cambrige.
Mayayd, Yves (2007); Droit Penal General, ed, PUF.
Nanda, Ved P (2011); Corporate Criminal Liability in the States: Is a New Approach Warranted? In: Pieth M & Ivory R; Emergence and Convergence: Corporate Criminal Liability Principlein Overview Volume 9, Springer.
Sahlool, Hashim Jalal (2013); Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparsion Between the law in the United State and Saudi Arabia.
Serlooten, P (2010); Principe de la Personnalité des peines et personnes morales, Bulletin Joly Sociétés 3.
Stefani, G and Levasseur, G and Bouloc, B (2007); Droit Pénal Général.
Wells C (2011); Corporate Liability in England and wales: past, Present, and Future; available at Corporate criminal liability, Volume, Springer.
Wells, C (2000); Criminal Responsibility of Legal persons in Common Law Jurisdictions: Room Document, DAFFE/ME/BR.
Wong, K (2012); Breking; The Cycle: The Development of Corporate Criminal Liability, a dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Law ( Honorus) at the University of Otago.