The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views

Limit the use of imprisonment based on Islamic law

Authors
1 Shahed University
2 Tarbieate Modarres University
Abstract
Imprisonment of religious thinking generally not considered a major penalty, but as an example of chastising, Security and Training is mostly correct, deter and prevent the recurrence of crime.Imprisonment as a means to stave off the threat of Islamic jurisprudence as well as some people in the community as well. Using large-scale copying the prison system and the prison sentences to punish the West and interchangeability in many cases the possibility of substitution exists in Islam is incompatible with the philosophy and criminal penalties. The use of punishment and negative freedom, the need to protect society against dangerous criminals, and in the event of a serious crime, and in another sense, it is expedient that the best interests of society and the philosophy of punishment in Islam. The use of prison, in exceptional cases and for certain offenders, prison is actually a response to those fans who are looking for a solution to deal with repeat offenders are dangerous and crime in the society. The use of imprisonment as a "last resort" and resorting to alternative economic sanctions on a large scale not only ensures the safety of the community, but also obligations concerning human rights-human dignity, dramatically reducing the cost of criminal justice.
Keywords

Bagaric, Micro, (2000-2001), Proportinonality in Sentencing: Its Justifivation, Meaning, and Role, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, volume 12 number 2.
Bordy S.R, (1996), The Effectiveness of Sentencing, Home Pffice Research, study, No 35, London, HMSO.
Kury, H & Ferdinand, T, (1999), Public Opinion and Punitivity, International Pournal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol.22, Nos 3-4.
M. Malcolm and Simon Jonathan, (1992), The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications. Criminology, Vol 30, No 40.
Commission canadienne, (1987), Report de Commission Canadienne Sur la Determinution de la Peine, P.48.
Sentencing Guideline's Cuncil, (2008), Dangerous Offenderd, Guide for Sentencers and Practitioners, Version 2, Tuly.
Smith D.Z & Ashworth. Andrew, (2004), Disproportionate Sentences as Human Rights Violations, the Modern Law Review, No 4, Volume 67.