Volume 25, Issue 92 (winter 2021)                   __Judicial Law Views __2012__, 25(__59__): __22485 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Izanloo M, Shahin A. Judicial Penalty: A Comparative Perspective on Iranian, French and International Commercial Law. دیدگاه‌های حقوقی. 2021; 25 (92) :61-85
URL: http://jlviews.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-1582-en.html
1- University of Tehran , Izanloo@ut.ac.ir
2- University of Tehran
Abstract:   (850 Views)
The Judicial Penalty is an effective legal institution in order to execution of the civil judgments. This concept belongs to Civil Law. There is an article in UNIDROIT Principles which deals with this penalty. Given the lack of recognition of this concept in some countries, there are some questions about enforcement of foreign judgments that include such penalty. This mechanism is used for execution of all of the judgments in French law. But, the Iranian courts do not use this measure, because there are some disagreements on abrogation of articles 729 and 730 of the former Civil Procedure Code (17 September 1939) and the lack of any equivalent article in later Civil Procedure Code (9 April 2000). The authors of this article are of the opinion that the said legal institution is not abrogated in Iranian law and it can be used for execution of the civil judgments.
Full-Text [PDF 576 kb]   (353 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable Research | Subject: Pivate Law
Received: 2019/03/17 | Revised: 2021/10/18 | Accepted: 2021/03/17 | Published: 2021/05/01 | ePublished: 2021/05/01

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Judicial Law Views Quarterly

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb