Volume 20, Issue 69 (Spring 2016 2015)                   __Judicial Law Views __2012__, 20(__59__): __224124 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zamani S G, Darounparvar A. Dynamism of “Investment” Concept in Light of ICSID Determining Jurisdiction Methodologies. دیدگاه‌های حقوقی. 2015; 20 (69) :97-124
URL: http://jlviews.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-770-en.html
1- Allameh Tabataba'i University , drghzamani@gmail.com
2- Allameh Tabataba'i University
Abstract:   (4736 Views)

It is passing nearly half a century from the ICSID activity and during this time, the concept of “investment” has changed to most controversial issue and the subject of many cases in this area. In one hand, the lack of definition in Washington convention and on the other hand, the dependence of ICSID tribunals for authenticating their competence on “double barreled” test which based on both relative treaties and Washington convention, caused that ICSID tribunals adopt various methodologies for identifying an “investment”. As a result, this can enhance the challenges in this area. This paper with the purpose of better understanding of these methodologies, seek to find a solution for the question of which perspective is more in accordance with the dynamic concept of “investment” and in fact, how they can unify the subjective legal concepts with objective Phenomena with regard to Washington convention.

Full-Text [PDF 321 kb]   (132 Downloads)    

Received: 2014/11/08 | Revised: 2019/01/27 | Accepted: 2015/09/16 | Published: 2016/01/26 | ePublished: 2016/01/26

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Judicial Law Views Quarterly

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb